Intergovernmental Organizations: Basic Elements to Consider

Intergovernmental Organizations, such as the World Bank, Inter-American Development Bank, the International Monetary Fund, the Asian Development Bank, and the United Nations (to name only a few), have retirement programs with unique rules for division pursuant to a divorce.

First, it is important to note that these organizations are not bound by US law, and therefore are not required to accept a US or state court order dividing one of their employee’s retirement interests. Many of these organizations, including the ones listed above do accept court orders for the purpose, so long as it conforms to the organization’s rules and regulations. The reason is because they want to promote law-abiding behaviors without waiving their privileges and immunities that they enjoy through their status as an intergovernmental organization.

Major points to consider in negotiating or arguing for retirement benefits provided by this organizations:

1. Survivor benefits. Most of these organizations will not allow a court order dividing the pension benefit to reference survivor benefits. Typically, these organizations require a former spouse survivor benefit be secured by the filing of a beneficiary designation form with the plan’s administrating office. Thus, it is important to require the participant to fill out and submit such form timely, and that such requirement is included in an enforceable document other than the order dividing the retirement benefits.

2.  Cost of survivor benefits. Most of these organizations do not allow for the cost to provide the survivor benefits to the former spouse to be shifted, and may require that the reduction be taken from the participant’s portion of the pension benefit. Where this is the case, parties can usually determine an equal amount by which they reduce the former spouse’s share of the benefit to effectively shift the reduction for the survivor benefits. However, since this involves more work and clear language in the separation agreement (or presentation of evidence to the court) it is wise to advise your client of the potential need for this early on, or to obtain as much information as possible so this is not a surprise after everything is resolved.

3.  Limitations on total award from the retirement plan. Many of these organizations include a limit on how much a participant’s retirement benefit can be reduced from all sources. In effect, the organization wants to secure some amount of the retirement benefit for the participant. The result in dividing it for a divorce means that sometimes the amount awarded to the former spouse must be reduced so that the participant still receives the minimum amount required from the plan. Specifically, imagine a case where the entire service is marital so the former spouse would receive 50% of the entire pension benefit. Then, the former spouse also wants a survivor benefit, but the reduction for the survivor benefit must come from the participant’s share of the pension. This would result in the participant receiving less than 50% of the pension benefit during their lifetime, which violates the plan’s rule that the participant cannot receive less than 50% of their pension benefit. So, in order for the plan to accept the division, the former spouse must either reduce their share of the pension to effectively shift the cost of the survivor benefit to the former spouse, or the former spouse must waive the survivor benefit.

   • This limit applies to all reductions, so if the participant has multiple marriages and is providing survivor benefits and a share of the pension to multiple former spouses or a current spouse, it is important to check that this rule is followed. Typically, if a draft order is submitted to these plans, they will advise if there is an issue here.

4.  Title of the Court Order. Since the plans are not bound by US laws, they will reject any document (even if otherwise acceptable) if it is called a Qualified Domestic Relations Order because that is a term specific to the Employee Retirement Income Security Act. Some organizations, like the World Bank, require the payment to the former spouse be called Spousal Support. Other organizations simply prohibit the term QDRO but will accept anything else. Especially if dealing with the World Bank, it is important to use the correct terminology in the agreement or other court orders.

   •  A special note here, there are cases in both Maryland and DC that state even though the World Bank requires the phrase “Spousal Support” to be used in their orders, that the courts can divide the benefits pursuant to the jurisdiction’s property division statutes similar to US-based retirement programs.

5.  Cash Balance and Commuted Benefits. Some of these programs include a cash balance benefit or allow the participant to receive a lump sum benefit at the beginning of their retirement followed by a monthly benefit. The organizations may require that these benefits each be discussed separately in the pension division order. Therefore, it is important to discuss in trial or in an agreement.

While there are other aspects to each plan that should be given special consideration these are the major points that come up frequently in these cases. As with all retirement benefits, the most important step is getting all the information early in the case to know all the elements that need to be addressed during the divorce process. We can assist in obtaining plan documents and determining benefits available for division in these types of cases. Depending on your needs, we can provide some services on a flat fee basis. For assistance and information regarding fees, please contact us at 240-396-4373.