BLOG
Pets and Divorce
Once a marriage ends, the law is fairly clear about how to divide property, and factors to examine how to determine custody of children – but now on the rise is a movement to create legal status for our beloved pets.
There are three main means of determining pet ownership at the time of divorce: property, custody, and a hybrid approach. Alaska is the first, and so far only state to give its courts power to grant custody of a pet in line with the best interests of the pet. (This is the same standard that Maryland uses for determining custody of children.) Although, other state courts, such as in Alabama and Connecticut, have simply applied the ‘best interests’ standard when determining pet ownership, without the passage of a statute.
The majority approach views pets as property, in which case title generally controls. This approach makes sense in theory, however, it completely ignores the emotional relationship between pet and owner.
The hybrid approach clarifies pets as a special type of property, and may even use a standard that takes into account the ‘best interests of all’ involved living beings (which could include the pet, owners, and children, if any). It appears that Maryland’s approach will be along these lines.
Maryland has not yet passed a law with respect to pets and divorce or annulment; however, the General Assembly is working to include pets in the existing property distribution statute. As the bill stands now, it would allow a court, during an annulment or divorce proceeding, to determine pet ownership, transfer ownership interest between parties, and award either party with access rights to the pet. (See House Bill 749).
Although Maryland is including pets in its property division statutes, it is clarifying that pets are a special kind of property. For example, the General Assembly is including pets as part of its definition of “family use personal property” which also includes cars and household appliances. “Family use personal property” terminates after three years, meaning that the other party’s interest in the item must be bought out, or the item must be sold and the proceeds divided, etc. The General Assembly has carved out an exception for pets in this instance, in that pets are not subject to the three-year limitation. Therefore, any determination made about the ownership and/or access schedule for pets is intended to remain in place for the remainder of the pet’s life.
In 2014, the American Academy of Matrimonial Lawyers noted a 27% increase in attorneys reporting couples fighting over pet custody during the previous five years across the country. With this rise in pets in family disputes, it may be the right time for state legislatures to advise courts on how to address the emotional bond between pets and their humans, in the event that the humans cannot agree.
Social Media Use in Divorce Cases
One question we are constantly asked is whether emails, text messages, voicemails, and/or social media accounts are potentially admissible as evidence. The simple answer to this question is YES! The E in E-mail stands for Evidence. A majority (if not all) of our litigated cases will include text messages, emails, or social media in some form or another.
We will ask the opposing party to produce in discovery their entire Facebook archive, text messages, and turn over all online communications between themselves and their soon to be former spouse.
That middle of the night text that was sent after a few two many glasses of wine...
The Facebook photo of you your friend posted and tagged you in...
The email from your former spouse asking you to take care of your child...
It’s all potentially “coming in” at trial and the Judge will hear and see every gory detail. Knowing this, here is some advice:
THINK before you post on any social media account. Even what seems like an innocent photo or post can later be used against you. Social media accounts have been used to show evidence of adultery, proof of location, and money spending habits to name a few.
THINK before you hit send on any email. Assume that every email will be admitted as evidence. Make sure that what is put in writing is something you would want the Judge to read.
Same goes for text messages. Be clear and be short when communicating via text messages. People are often more brazen about what they say via text. Assume that a Judge will be reading every text.
Recent changes in the law require that individuals now protect from change and destruction all electronically stored information during the pendency of a divorce case. So make sure what’s out there paints you in the best possible light. As the old saying goes, “If you have nothing nice to say, say nothing at all”.
In the age of technology, you should not underestimate the impact of electronically stored information on divorces. To learn more about this newly changing and expanding topic contact the attorneys at the Markham Law Firm by calling (240) 396-4373.
Military Divorce- What's the Difference?
Getting a divorce when one or both spouses are military members or former military can present interesting challenges. In dealing with a military divorce there are unique rules which govern the division of military retirement, impact of deployments on parenting, whether combat related special compensation is divisible, health care and other military benefits, to name a few.
The Service Members Civil Relief Act or SCRA was designed to help deployed servicemembers stay civil proceeding that they are unable to attend. SCRA applies to all judicial proceeding, including post-decree matters, and to administrive agencies. SCRA covers active duty servicemembers, including reservists and mobilized members of the National Guard. The stay will generally last 90 days but can be extended.
Child Custody. What makes custody matters with servicemembers different? A deployment will trigger the need to modify child custody orders. Often the custody order will state that during a deployment, custody will transfer to the nonservice member. However, under the Uniform Deployed Parent Custody and Visitation Act the servicemember may now delegate their parental rights to a third party. One scenario where this often comes up is with a new spouse of a deployed servicemember. The deployed servicemember can request that their new spouse be given their same custodial rights during deployment.
Child Support. When calculating child support the Court will look at base pay PLUS any housing allowance received, VA disability benefits, and any sustenance credits. If the servicemember lives on base, the Court can impute the amount of housing allowance they would receive if they lived off base.
Military Pension, Retirement and Benefits. Retirement for active duty servicemembers comes after they have obtained 20 years of active duty service. Retired pay can be calculated one of 2 ways. If the Date of Initial Entry to Military Service (DIEMS) is before September 8, 1980 the formula will use the final base pay at the time of retirement. If the DIEMS is after September 8, 1980, then it is a High-3 formula, which takes the average of the highest 36 months of base pay as the amount for the final base pay. If the servicemember took a Career Status Bonus election between 14.5 and 15 years of service, this will change the pension landscape entirely. Military pensions have unique aspects to them, very different from civilian pensions.
Thrift Savings Plan (TSP). Servicemembers may now contribute up to 7% of their basic pay to a TSP, but with no matching funds from the federal government. It is similar to a private sector 401(k) plan in that taxes are deferred on the contributions and appreciation until disbursement. A Court must sign a Retirement Order to divide the TSP.
Survivor Benefit Plan (SBP). SBP is an annuity program that allow retired (and retirement eligible) active-duty servicemembers to provide income to SBP beneficiaries upon death of the servicemember. It has a premium, and a payout in the form of a monthly payment from DFAS. Without the SBP, if the retiree dies, the military retirement stops as well. However, to protect a surviving former spouse’s share of military retirement after a divorce, a Court can require a servicemember to elect former spouse SBP coverage. As the retiree can only have one beneficiary (except for children coverage), one effect of court-ordered SBP coverage for a former spouse is that if the service member remarries, the new spouse or children are precluded from coverage. In the event of the servicemember’s death, the former spouse receives a monthly payment of 55% of the designated base amount. The cost for the SBP premium is typically 6.5% of the designated base amount although there are other options available for those entering service before March 1, 1990. There is not a way to force DFAS to allocate the premium so that the full share comes from one party’s share of the pension. The cost must come "off the top". However, there exist other options to get around this. If the former spouse gets remarried before age 55, the SBP will terminate.
Healthcare. A former spouse who was married to a servicemember for at least 20 years qualifies for military health benefits, or Tricare. A former spouse will receive full benefits under the 20/20/20 Rule if they were married to the servicemember for at least 20 years, the servicemember has at least 20 years of service, and that the marriage and service overlap for at least 20 years. If this criteria is met, the servicemember will receive Tricare for life. For 15 years of marriage/service with 20 years of total service the former spouse will receive Tricare for one year. Medical benefits terminate upon the former spouse’s remarriage. If the servicemember has fewer that 20 years of service, the former spouse is NOT entitled to such benefits.
Hiring an attorney is an important decision. If you are a servicemember or married to a servicemember, make sure your attorney has experience with military divorce issues. If you wish to learn more, please give us a call at 240-396-4373.
Looking for more information? Search our prior blog posts by topic below or using search bar below: